EconomyFeaturedNigeria

Why Some Nigerians Are Still Poor Despite FG’s Economic Reforms — Oyedele

By Ayodele Quadri, Lagos Times Correspondent

ABUJA, NIGERIA — The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, has addressed growing public concerns over why millions of Nigerians continue to experience widespread poverty and economic hardship despite the Federal Government’s ongoing structural reforms.

Speaking during an interactive session with the National Orientation Agency (NOA), Oyedele defended the administration’s fiscal policy choices—including the removal of fuel subsidies and exchange rate unification. He explained that while the initial consequence of dismantling years of “fiscal illusions” was an unavoidable drop in real income levels, the economic reset was critical to saving Nigeria from outright financial collapse.

Key Operational Highlights

  • The Counterfactual Argument: Oyedele challenged critics to evaluate the current economy against where Nigeria would have landed without reforms. Before the reset, the country relied heavily on central bank money printing (Ways and Means advances) to cover budget deficits while servicing public debt at interest rates that surged from 8% to 24%.

  • Shift from Fiscal Illusions: The minister noted that fuel subsidies and artificially pegged exchange rates created a false sense of prosperity. Removing these distortions temporarily depressed purchasing power, leading to an initial increase in multidimensional poverty indicators.

  • Low-Productivity Trap: Oyedele highlighted that despite official unemployment statistics standing around 5%, widespread poverty persists because over 80% of the workforce remains trapped in low-productivity, low-wage jobs across informal agriculture and retail services.

  • Positive Rebound Metrics: Citing macroeconomic indicators, Oyedele stated that Nigeria’s real per capita income growth in dollar terms expanded by nearly 10% in 2025, signaling that the stabilization phase is beginning to yield measurable recovery.

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│             OYEDELE ECONOMIC REFORM DIAGNOSTIC MATRIX                  │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Lead Presenter   : Taiwo Oyedele (Minister of Finance & Economy)     │
│                                                                        │
│ • Root Cause Identified: Years of "Fiscal Illusions" & Deficit Printing│
│                                                                        │
│ • Debt Service Shift : Debt interest obligations escalated from 8%     │
│                        to 24% post-reform, requiring strict allocation │
│                                                                        │
│ • Workforce Reality  : 80%+ of citizens work in low-productivity jobs  │
│                                                                        │
│ • Policy Pivot       : Shifting focus from macro-stability to job       │
│                        creation, real income expansion & tax relief   │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

“You Cannot Remove Subsidy and People Become Richer Overnight”

Pushing back against assertions by international institutions that the reform program failed ordinary citizens, Finance Minister Taiwo Oyedele emphasized:

“I tend to disagree with the narrative that the reforms were bad… The reform itself was a reset. We were living in fiscal illusions, so we needed to stop deceiving ourselves so the country could move forward. That reset meant that income levels, in real terms, would fall, and that would increase poverty. But you cannot remove subsidy and people become richer overnight.” Taiwo Oyedele, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy

Explaining the hidden structural costs that worsened economic hardship following the subsidy removal, Oyedele added:

“Many Nigerians simply compare the past with the present and conclude that the reform is not working for them… What we usually don’t ask is: where would we have been if the reforms were not carried out? Before the reforms, we were printing money to spend. Because the reforms induced higher prices, interest rates went up. Instead of paying 8 per cent on our debts, we were paying as high as 24 per cent. When you need to service debts, you don’t debate whether you need to pay—you pay on time.” — Taiwo Oyedele

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com