<<The book WITNESS TO JUNE 12 will be out soon. Watch Out!!!>>
Chapter 18: The Shadow of Power – From Abacha’s Ambition to Obasanjo’s Ascension
By Biodun Durojaiye
As Nigeria’s struggle to actualize the June 12, 1993, presidential mandate reached its darkest hour, General Sani Abacha’s iron grip tightened over the nation. The annulled election, which had crowned Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola with 8.3 million votes, faded into a distant dream under Abacha’s brutal regime. By 1998, the dictator was orchestrating an audacious plan to transmute from military head of state to civilian president, backed by a choreographed campaign and the fervent prayers of clerics. Yet, fate intervened with his sudden death, thrusting General Abdulsalami Abubakar into power. Abubakar’s promise of democracy offered hope, only to be marred by Abiola’s suspicious death and whispers of a northern elite wary of a Yoruba progressive. In the aftermath, Olusegun Obasanjo, a Yoruba conservative trusted by the military and northern powerbrokers, emerged as president in 1999, a carefully engineered outcome that closed the chapter on June 12 but left its wounds unhealed. This is the story of ambition, tragedy, and political maneuvering that shaped Nigeria’s return to civil rule.
Read Also: Witness to June 12: The Story of Nigeria’s Annulled Election (CH 6)
Abacha’s Grand Design: A Civilian Facade
By early 1998, General Sani Abacha, who had seized power in November 1993, was preparing to cement his rule through a staged transition to civilian presidency. The annulment of June 12 and Abiola’s imprisonment had silenced much of the opposition, with NADECO leaders either exiled, detained, or assassinated. Abacha’s regime, flush with oil revenues but isolated internationally, crafted a plan to legitimize his rule. In 1997, he established five political parties—the United Nigeria Congress Party (UNCP), Democratic Party of Nigeria (DPN), National Centre Party of Nigeria (NCPN), Grassroots Democratic Movement (GDM), and Committee for National Consensus (CNC)—all of which were widely seen as regime puppets. “These parties were created to serve Abacha’s ambition,” noted Africa Confidential in 1998, describing them as “orchestrated to ensure a single outcome.”
In March 1998, a group called Youth Earnestly Ask for Abacha (YEAA), led by figures like Daniel Kanu, launched a nationwide campaign urging Abacha to run for president. Billboards proclaiming “Abacha for Continuity” adorned Lagos and Abuja, while YEAA organized rallies, drawing thousands—many reportedly paid or coerced, per Refworld. “Abacha is the leader Nigeria needs,” Kanu declared at a rally in Kano, as reported by The Guardian Nigeria. The campaign’s fervor was matched by Abacha’s spiritual preparations: he enlisted Islamic clerics to recite the Qur’an one million times, seeking divine favor for his transition, according to Vanguard Nigeria. By April 1998, all five parties adopted Abacha as their sole presidential candidate, a move The New York Times described as “a coronation rather than a contest.”
To NADECO and pro-democracy activists, Abacha’s plan was a mockery of June 12. “This is not democracy; it is dictatorship in disguise,” said Wole Soyinka, broadcasting from exile on Radio Kudirat, as quoted in West Africa magazine. The international community, including the Commonwealth, which had suspended Nigeria in 1995, condemned the process, but Abacha appeared unstoppable. With Abiola languishing in detention and opposition voices silenced, the stage was set for his “election” in August 1998.
The Sudden Death: A Turning Point
On June 8, 1998, Abacha died unexpectedly in Abuja, reportedly of a heart attack, though rumors of poisoning swirled. Africa Research Bulletin noted the lack of an official autopsy, fueling speculation, but confirmed his death marked a seismic shift. The news stunned Nigeria, eliciting mixed reactions: relief among pro-democracy activists, uncertainty among northern elites who had backed him, and fear of chaos in a nation long suppressed. “Abacha’s death opened a door we thought was sealed,” said Ayo Adebanjo, a NADECO leader, in a 1998 interview with Vanguard Nigeria.
General Abdulsalami Abubakar, Abacha’s Chief of Defence Staff, was sworn in as head of state the same day. Unlike his predecessor, Abubakar signaled a willingness to restore democracy. On June 9, he announced plans to release political prisoners and initiate a transition to civilian rule, as reported by The Guardian Nigeria. “We must heal the wounds of the past and return Nigeria to its people,” he stated in a nationwide broadcast. His actions lent credence to his words: by July, he freed several detainees, including NADECO members like Beko Ransome-Kuti and Gani Fawehinmi, per Refworld. Abubakar also dissolved Abacha’s five parties and established the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to oversee credible elections, a move praised by The New York Times.
Abiola’s Suspicious Death: A Mandate Extinguished
As Abubakar prepared to release Abiola, hope flickered that the June 12 mandate might finally be realized. Abiola, detained since June 1994, had endured harsh conditions, yet remained a symbol of resistance. On July 7, 1998, during a meeting with a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Thomas Pickering and Commonwealth officials, Abiola collapsed after drinking tea and died within hours. Amnesty International reported that an autopsy, conducted under international supervision, cited heart failure, but the absence of conclusive evidence fueled suspicions of foul play. “Abiola’s death was too convenient for those who feared his presidency,” said Anthony Enahoro, a NADECO co-founder, in a 1998 statement reported by The Guardian Nigeria.
Whispers of a conspiracy to “balance the equation” emerged, suggesting Abiola was killed to appease northern elites reeling from Abacha’s death and wary of a progressive Yoruba leader. Africa Confidential noted that some northern powerbrokers viewed Abiola’s presidency as a threat to their influence, given his independence and cross-regional appeal. The timing—weeks after Abacha’s death and on the eve of his planned release—intensified speculation, though no definitive evidence of murder has surfaced, per Sahara Reporters. “The circumstances of Abiola’s death will haunt Nigeria forever,” wrote Vanguard Nigeria in a 1998 editorial, reflecting the nation’s grief and distrust.
Abiola’s death crushed the June 12 movement’s immediate hopes, though NADECO vowed to continue the struggle. “We have lost our leader, but not our resolve,” said Abraham Adesanya, a NADECO leader, in a press conference reported by West Africa. The tragedy deepened Nigeria’s ethnic fault lines, with Yoruba communities in Lagos and Ibadan staging protests, accusing the military of orchestrating a double loss—Abacha for the north, Abiola for the south.
Obasanjo’s Rise: A Compromise Candidate
With Abiola’s death, the path to democracy shifted dramatically. Abubakar’s transition program, announced in July 1998, set return to civil rule for May 1999, allowing new political parties to form. The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Alliance for Democracy (AD), and All People’s Party (APP) emerged as frontrunners. Amid this, Olusegun Obasanjo, the former military ruler imprisoned by Abacha in 1995, was positioned as a presidential candidate. Released in June 1998, Obasanjo joined the PDP, backed by a coalition of military and northern elites, including General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, who wielded influence from the shadows, per Africa Confidential.
Obasanjo’s candidacy was a carefully crafted compromise. As a Yoruba, he addressed southwestern demands for representation after Abiola’s death, but as a conservative with military ties, he was trusted by northern elites wary of a progressive like Abiola. “Obasanjo was seen as a safe pair of hands,” noted The New York Times in 1999, citing his longstanding relationships with figures like Babangida and General Aliyu Gusau. His campaign, funded by northern powerbrokers and military allies, emphasized stability over radical change, contrasting with Abiola’s “Hope ’93” vision.
The AD and APP formed a coalition, nominating Chief Olu Falae, a Yoruba economist, to challenge Obasanjo. However, Abubakar’s government ensured Obasanjo’s victory through INEC’s control and strategic interventions, per Africa Research Bulletin. On February 27, 1999, Obasanjo won with 62.78% of the vote, against Falae’s 37.22%, as reported by The Guardian Nigeria. Allegations of rigging surfaced, with Refworld noting irregularities in voter registration and result collation, but international observers, including the Commonwealth, deemed the election “acceptable” given the context.
Obasanjo’s inauguration on May 29, 1999, marked Nigeria’s return to civilian rule, ending 16 years of military governance. “We must rebuild a nation torn by division,” he declared in his inaugural address, quoted by Vanguard Nigeria. Yet, to many June 12 activists, his presidency was a bittersweet outcome—a Yoruba leader, but not the one chosen by the people. “Obasanjo’s victory was a consolation, not a vindication,” said Bola Tinubu, a NADECO exile who returned to become Lagos State governor, in a 1999 interview with West Africa.
June 12: Legacy of a Turbulent Transition
The events of 1998–1999 closed the June 12 chapter but left unresolved questions. Abacha’s thwarted ambition exposed the fragility of Nigeria’s democratic aspirations, while Abiola’s death deepened the nation’s wounds. Abubakar’s transition, though imperfect, delivered civilian rule, but Obasanjo’s rise underscored the enduring influence of military and northern elites. In 2018, President Muhammadu Buhari declared June 12 as Democracy Day, posthumously awarding Abiola the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR). “June 12th, 1993 was the day when Nigerians in millions expressed their democratic will,” he stated, as reported by The Guardian Nigeria. The recognition honored the struggle but could not erase the pain of a mandate stolen, a leader lost, and a nation manipulated.
The journey from Abacha’s schemes to Obasanjo’s presidency was a tapestry of ambition, tragedy, and compromise. It revealed Nigeria’s resilience and its vulnerabilities, a nation yearning for democracy yet bound by the shadows of power. For those who fought for June 12, the fight was not in vain, but its victory was incomplete—a poignant reminder of the cost of freedom.
