READ ALSO: PIB: Southern governors reject 3 percent share of oil revenue (Full text of meeting)
PANDEF also described the 30 per cent provision for the Frontier Exploration Fund in the proposed law to be reviewed and presented to President Muhammadu Buhari for signing as “fraudulent and provocative.”
The Chief Edwin Clark-led group demanded immediate reversal and review of the PIB to ensure that the oil-bearing communities receive at least 10 per cent of operating cost.
PANDEF’s National Publicity Secretary, Ken Robinson, at a media briefing in Abuja, warned that oil exploration activities in the Niger Delta region might be disrupted if the Federal Government failed to meet the demands on the PIB.
“If this is not done, the Niger Delta people may be forced to take their destiny in their hands and all international oil companies (IOCs) may be denied access to their installations and oil activities in the communities,” he stressed.
Explaining why it rejected some aspects of the PIB, PANDEF said: “It is not clear where the Frontier Basins currently reside. We the Niger Delta people would be happy if all regions of the country were to be oil producing. However, we must be careful to use the resources at our disposal, as judiciously as possible.
“Rather than using our country’s funds to exploit its existing resources, we are using our scarce funds on exploring oil in the North, an exercise that most industry stakeholders have described as “wasteful, a wild goose chase and political exploration.”
“So, the Ad-Hoc Committee’s recommendation that funding of the Frontier Exploration Fund, which was previously based on 10 per cent of Petroleum Prospecting Licenses (PPLs) and Petroleum Mining Leases (PMLs) rents should be increased by 30 per cent from the newly commercialised NNPC’s oil and gas profit, as in the production, profit sharing and risk service contracts took us by surprise,” it said.
Speaking further, PANDEF argued that it was not clear where the recommendation came from, adding that Niger Delta representatives that attended the public hearings did not recall hearing any request for additional funding for the Frontier Exploration Fund from any industry stakeholder.
“Therefore, we totally condemn not only the concept itself, but also the means through which it was smuggled into the Bill,” it added.
