Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) is seeking the adoption of equality 20%, population 30%, and derivation 50% as revenue sharing formula between Federal, state and local government areas.
According to a statement by the Director-General of LCCI, Dr Chinyere Almona, the current sharing formula is a major factor for the Value Added Tax imbroglio between state governments and the Federal Inland Revenue Service.
“The first concern of the Chamber is the confusion that businesses face as to who is in charge of Value Added Tax (VAT) collection. This is not healthy for the business community and planning. We, however, hail the swift intervention of the Court of Appeal to reduce the uncertainties surrounding these controversies.
“A court judgment restrained the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) from collecting Value Added Tax (VAT) and empowered the Rivers State government to collect tax from within the state. Following this, the Rivers and Lagos state Houses of Assembly passed respective bills into law in their states to start the collection of VAT. The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered a stay of execution of the court judgement pending the determination of the appeal filed by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).”
According to her, “Businesses should not be subjected to unnecessary hurdles and made to pay the same tax twice from different agencies. The Federal Government should urgently establish an understanding with states on what is best for the nation and businesses.”
“VAT was introduced in 1993 to replace the sales tax in the states. The original formula for the distribution was 50% to the Federal Government, 35% to States, and 15% to LGAs. But with effect from January 1999, the formula was adjusted to be 15% to FGN, 50% to States, and 35% to LGAs. Presently, the States and LGAs share their allocation using the factors of equality 50%, population 30%, and derivation 20%.
“We advise that the current sharing formula for the States and LGAs be adjusted using the factors of equality 20%, population 30%, and derivation 50% going forward.
She explained that “this arrangement should be agreeable by all concerned parties. This can drive innovation on revenue generation in all the States towards increasing their internally generated revenue. It will also make the States more sensitive to the needs of businesses in their respective States, knowing that an enabling business environment is likely to boost tax revenues,” she said.
